Guddu Vishwakarma @ Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57078 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-348 Year-2018 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Guddu Vishwakarma @ Guddu Kumar S/o Late Doman Vishwakarma, R/o Vill.- Bhusiya, P.S.- Cherki, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Bodh Gaya (Cherki) P.S. Case No. 348 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B, 301/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant who is father of the victim has alleged that 3 years before he married his daughter to the petitioner and thereafter she was being subjected to torture for non fulfillment of demand of dowry and on 04.06.2018 he came to know that her daughter was killed.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during investigation it was found that deceased had committed suicide and police has submitted chargesheet u/s 306 of IPC. Relation between husband and wife was cordial. It has been further submitted that the parties have arrived at the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57078 of 2018(6) dt.25-10-2018 2/2 compromise. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 12.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Bodh Gaya (Cherki) P.S. Case No. 348 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U