Sabir v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77076 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2024 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Sabir Son of Saleem R/O Kairaka P.S.- Jaisinghpur Chowli (Nuh), Dist.- Mewat, State- Haryana.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals have stolen Rs. 4,55,100/- from the S.B.I. ATM machine.
4. Materials have come in the case diary including the self inculpatory statement of the petitioner. The petitioner is accused in five more criminal cases. The petitioner is in jail since 06.08.2024.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77076 of 2024(2) dt.11-12-2024 2/2
6. Considering the allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
8. The trial is directed to be expedited.
9. The Superintendent of Police, Saran is directed to get the witnesses examined on the date fixed in the trial. If the trial is delayed because of non-examination of the witnesses, the Superintendent of Police, Saran will have to explain the reason.
10. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve a copy of petition to Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned APP for the State by tomorrow.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T