Sandip Kumar Rana v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2942 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20253 of 2012 ====================================================== Sandip Kumar Rana, Son of Sri Ran Umesh Prasad, Resident of MohallaNew Colony, Balughat, P.O.+P.S.- Muzaffarpur Town, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, H.R.D. New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal, Muzaffarpur.

4. The District Education Superintendent, Muzaffarpur.

5. The Block Development Officer, Musahari, Muzaffarpur.

6. The Block Education Extention Officer, Musahari, Muzaffarpur.

7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Sahbajpur, Musahari, Muzaffarpur.

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Sahbajpur, Musahari, Muzaffarpur.

9. The Head Master, Primary School, Zero Mile, Bazar Samiti, Musahari, Muzaffarpur.

10. Rina Kumari, D/o Sri Nathuni Ram, Mohalla- Lakaridhai Chandwara, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The present application has been filed for modification of order dated 08.08.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 20253 of 2012 by which the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority against the order dated 19.09.2012 passed by the District Teachers

Patna High Court MJC No.2942 of 2017 (3) dt.07-02-2018 2/2 Employment Appellate Authority, Muzaffarpur, within a period of thirty days from the date of order i.e. 08.08.2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some unavoidable reasons, he could not prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority. Hence, he prays for further thirty days time to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority. Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, the petitioner is granted further thirty days time to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority from today. The order dated 08.08.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 20253 of 2012 stands modified to the extent as indicated above. The modification application is, accordingly, allowed. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U