Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51350 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -62 Year- 2017 Thana -TELHARA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Pappu Kumar S/o Late Ganauri Yadav, R/o Village- Telhara, Beldari Tola, P.S.- Telhara, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Telhara P.S. Case No. 62/2017 instituted for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that vehicle in question was recovered from the possession of Avanish Kumar. He disclosed that he has purchased the motorcycle from his Mousera brothers Vinay Kumar and Pappu Kumar (petitioner). Name of these petitioners has been disclosed in the confessional statement of the co-accused. There is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is working in private firm in Mumbai and he was not present at the place of occurrence. He has clean antecedent.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51350 of 2017 (2) dt.08-11-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Telhara P.S. Case No. 62/2017, shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and

(3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) Vinita/- U T