Tabrej Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72998 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2025 Thana- BARHARIA District- Siwan ====================================================== Tabrej Alam S/O Late Hasim Kuraishi Resident of village- Lakridargah, P.S.- Barharia, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 283 of 2025 arising out of Barharia P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 103(1), 109, 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner attacked his cousin Nausad Alam with a big knife in his shop, killing him on the spot. In the meantime, when Kasim Quraishi and Parvej Alam tried to intervene, they were also injured by the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72998 of 2025(2) dt.30-10-2025 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 02.02.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner stating that there is specific allegation of giving knife blow to the deceased against the petitioner and therefore, the petitioner does not deserve to be released on bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being direct allegation of giving knife blow upon the deceased against this petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.

8. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

9. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew the prayer for grant of bail before the Trial Court if the trial is not concluded within a period of nine months from today. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T