Dilkhush Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73870 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2024 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia ====================================================== Dilkhush Kumar, Son of Bharat Lal Mehta, Resident of Village - Raghunathpur, Ward No.- 04, P.S.- Bhargama, District - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Shekhar Singh, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prior to the present Cr. Misc. petition for regular bail, the petitioner has moved Cr. Misc. 34769 of 2025 which was rejected by this Court vide order dated 13.08.2025. However, it was stipulated that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed certified copy of the order dated 23.08.2025 which shows that the charge has been framed against the petitioner in the case by learned Trial Court.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73870 of 2025(3) dt.14-11-2025 2/2

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, abovenamed, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below, in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024 on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required. (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. (iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U T