Praveen Singh @ Pravindra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71823 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2025 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Praveen Singh @ Pravindra Singh S/o Late Ramji Singh R/o vill - Salarpur, P.S.- Parbatta, Distt.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amardeep, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that she came to know that accused are cutting her crops, accordingly, she went to the field along with her mother and sister and saw the accused persons, namely, petitioner, Vakil Singh and Shri Singh. Further, the accused on seeing them fired but the informant and her family members were saved thereafter the police came and recovered two empty cartridges.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71823 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurence is alleged to have been committed. It is next submitted that allegation of firing is an exaggerated allegation only to give seriouness to the case when no one was injured. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is not a criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 109 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T