← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79871/2025bail granted

Rajkishore Paswan @ Raj Kishor Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-08Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79871 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-897 Year-2017 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Rajkishore Paswan @ Raj Kishor Paswan S/o- Suraj Paswan Resident of Village- Kolhuarwa, Ward no. 18, P.S.-Motihari Town, District- East Champaran 2.

Nirgun Paswan @ Nirgun Hazra S/o- Janak Hazra Resident of VillageKolhuarwa, ward no. 18, P.S.-Motihari Town, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Samir Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-12-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that under the scheme Swachh Bharat Mission, the petitioners obtained first installment of Rs.7,500/- to construct lavatory in their house but they did not construct the lavatory and, thus, misappropriated the government amount.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79871 of 2025(2) dt.08-12-2025 2/2 the informant. It is further submitted that the FIR was instituted in haste without enquiring as to whether the lavatory has been constructed or not. It is next submitted that today even if the authorities come to the house of the petitioners to enquire, they will find the lavatory present.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 897 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T