Vikash Ram @ Ranjan Ram @ Krishna Ram @ Takla v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75662 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-417 Year-2024 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Vikash Ram @ Ranjan Ram @ Krishna Ram @ Takla Son of Bhuneshwar Ram @ Matar Ram @ Rambabu Ram village- and ps- Sugauli, Dist- East champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 417 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 380, 411, 413, 414, 401/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, 23 bundles of clothes were alleged to have been taken away by the petitioner and other co-accused persons. However, their name had surfaced during the course of investigation when one of the co-accused namely, Raju Raut disclosed the name of the present petitioner to be one of the accomplice.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated merely because he carries criminal antecedent and nothing has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75662 of 2024(6) dt.16-04-2025 2/3 been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He states that even if the statement of the co-accused is taken into account the other co-accused persons Anwarul Haque and Raju Raut (who had taken the name of the petitioner) both were released on bail by the learned court below. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.07.2024.

5. The learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and has stated that the petitioner carries criminal antecedent and he is involved in such nature of crime and the seizure list as contained in para 20 of case diary suggest that the articles which were recovered by the police after the theft were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and other coaccused.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and taking into account the period of custody and that the similarly situated coaccused namely, Anwarul Haque and Raju Yadav, on whose statement the name of the petitioner has surfaced has been released on bail by the learned Court below, let the petitioner be released on bail furnishing bail bond of 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Town P.S.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75662 of 2024(6) dt.16-04-2025 3/3 Case No. 417 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:- (I) However, any further if the name of the petitioner surfaces in any other case, the prosecution shall be at liberty to press for the cancellation of the bail bond of the petitioner. (Sourendra Pandey, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T