Shankar Dayal Kumar @ Bangat Sharma @ Shankar Dayal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73712 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2022 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== SHANKAR DAYAL KUMAR @ BANGAT SHARMA @ SHANKAR DAYAL Son of Late Ramashish Singh SR/V- Sonawan, P.S- Ghosi, DistJehanabad, Bihar- 804405 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Akash Shankar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 379, 384, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, petitioner is said to have demanded ransom from the informant and threatened him through mobile. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to local politics. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is specific allegation of assault
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73712 of 2022(2) dt.27-03-2023 2/2 against co-accused Sonam Kumar and Agam Kumar. It is further submitted that no any ransom has been given to the petitioner by the prosecution party. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner is habitual offender, hence he does not deserve anticipatory bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of case as well as the nature of the offence, as there is allegation against the petitioner that he demanded ransom from the informant, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T