Sunil Kumar Pathak And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17738 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Sunil Kumar Pathak, Son of Late Awadhesh Pathak, Resident of Village+P.O.- Lav, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya.

2. Bachchi Devi, Wife of Nand Kishor Sharma, Resident of Village+P.O.- Bhori, Block- Tekari, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Gaya.

5. The District Education Officer, Gaya.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s : Smt. Shilpa Singh, GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-05-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if they are permitted to file a representation before the respondent no. 3 regarding their grievances mentioned in the writ petition and the respondent no. 3 be directed to dispose of the said representation within a specified time frame.

Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioners may file a representation regarding their grievances within two weeks and in case such representation is filed before the respondent no. 3, then the same may be considered and disposed of within a period of

Patna High Court CWJC No.17738 of 2017 (2) dt.01-05-2018 2/2 four weeks from the date of filing of the said representation by a speaking and reasoned order.

The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U