Pankaj Mahto @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 85140 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2020 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Pankaj Mahto @ Pankaj Kumar Son of Krishna Mahto Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.S. - Doriganj, District - Saran. 2.

Jyoti Kumari Daughter of Krishna Mahto Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.S. - Doriganj, District - Saran.

3.

Pintu Kumar @ Niraj Kumar Son of Krishna Mahto Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.S. - Doriganj, District - Saran. 4.

Kiran Devi @ Kiran Kumari, Daughter of Krishna Mahto Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.S. - Doriganj, District - Saran. 5.

Umrawati Devi Wife of Krishna Mahto Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.S. - Doriganj, District - Saran.

6.

Jiut Mahto Son of Late Sakhichandra Mahto Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.S. - Doriganj, District - Saran.

7.

Krishna Mahto @ Krishna Pd. Nirala, Son of Late Lakhchandra Mahto @ Late Lakhichandra Mahto, Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.S. - Doriganj, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Seema Devi, Wife of Sunil Mahto, Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.S. - Doriganj, District - Saran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anjani Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 15-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. Considering the submission, defect(s) as pointed out by the office be ignored for the present.

3. After short argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw this present application

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 85140 of 2024(2) dt.15-04-2025 2/2 with liberty to raise all such issues, as raised through present petition before learned trial court itself, at the stage of framing of charge or at other appropriate stage.

4. Request allowed.

5. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed as withdrawn, however with aforesaid liberty. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T