Mohammad Aijaj @ Md. Aijaj @ Aijaz Ahmad @ Mohmmad Ajij @ Ajij Ahmmad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75773 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2024 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Mohammad Aijaj @ Md. Aijaj @ Aijaz Ahmad @ Mohmmad Ajij @ Ajij Ahmmad Son of Sk. Razzak @ Abdul Razzak village- shankar Saraiya Tola Bankat, Ps- Turkauliya, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv Mr.Nafisu Zzoha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2024 1.

Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Shri. N.K. Agarwal and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 109, 337, 435, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had earlier moved this court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 68162 of 2024, but the same was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after filing of charge-sheet.

4.

The learned senior counsel next submits that Chargesheet No. 299 of 2024 dated 26-9-2024 has been submitted against the petitioner. It is thus submitted that since charge-sheet has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75773 of 2024(2) dt.18-10-2024 2/2 submitted as such no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind bars. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 289 of 2024. 7.

One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, Sk. Razzak @ Abdul Razzak.

8.

It is made clear if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, in that event, the learned trial court shall at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner forthwith after recording reasons.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T