Niranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.72875 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-455 Year-2017 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Niranjan Kumar Son of Daya Nand Prasad, Resident of Village-Aima Chowki Police Station-Khizer Sarai, Distirct Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar No.- 4 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No. 455 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B) of Arms Act.

Informant who is the Police Officer has stated in his self statement that while he was on patrolling duty one motorcycle boarded miscreants tried to flee away after seeing the police and thereafter he was apprehended after chase and disclosed his name as Raja Babu but could not produce the ownership of the vehicle and from possession of Raja Babu one country made pistol and one live cartridge and one Indel mobile was recovered who disclosed the name of petitioner that he

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72875 of 2018(2) dt.13-12-2018 2/2 provided necessary help in theft of the motorcycle and petitioner used to sell those stolen motorcycle outside. Petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No. 455 of 2017 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T