Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75673 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2024 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Yadav S/O Somar Yadav R/O Village- Supta, Tola- Khemni Bigha, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Karpi P.S. case No. 97 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 386, 387, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the five unknown miscreants armed with weapons came at the brick kiln of the informant and snatched the mobile phones from the labourers and threatened of dire consequences. It is further alleged that the accused persons have earlier demanded ransom from the informant and are the members of Maobaadi Communist Party. It is further alleged that they threatened the informant that if the ransom is not paid, they would kill the informant as well as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75673 of 2024(2) dt.22-11-2024 2/3 labourers.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Udal Kumar who has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 03.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 45878 of 2024. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has two criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Karpi P.S. case No. 97 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75673 of 2024(2) dt.22-11-2024 3/3 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T