Janak Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72115 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2022 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Janak Yadav S/O Jagdish Yadav R/O Village- Miyabagh, P.O And P.SKarpi, District- Arwal 2.

Binay Kumar S/O Baiju Yadav R/O Village- Miyabagh, P.O And P.S- Karpi, District- Arwal 3.

Suraj Kumar S/O Naval Yadav R/O Village- Miyabagh, P.O And P.S- Karpi, District- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 447, 341, 323, 308 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members. It is further alleged that they also tried to outrage the modesty of female family members of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72115 of 2022(3) dt.01-05-2023 2/2 He submits that there is case and coutner case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries and the injuries was found simple in nature, he enclosed the nature of injury by way of supplementary affidavit. He submits that there is no specific overt act against these petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of injury, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No.163 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T