Brijesh Kuwar @ Vrijesh Kuwar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68821 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2019 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== BRIJESH KUWAR @ VRIJESH KUWAR Son of Shambhu Singh @ Shambhu Kuar Resident of Village- Bijulpur, Sirsa, Police StationBaikunthpur, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation against the petitioner is that he was arrested with 31.425 litre of illicit liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion. Petitioner is in custody since 08.09.2019 having no criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68821 of 2019(2) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Baikunthpur P. S. Case No. 237 of 2019 with following conditions:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T