Raja Ram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24893 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2017 Thana -BISFI District- MADHUBANI ======================================================
1. Raja Ram Yadav, S/o Surendra Yadav, Resident of VillageChandravana, Bisfi, P.S.- Patauna, (O.P.), Distt.- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Kamran, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Bisfi P. S. Case No. 123 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and others is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no any specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner and material during investigation discloses that there was land dispute between the petitioner and the informant. It has been further submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and he has no any criminal antecedents. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail on the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24893 of 2018 (3) dt.05-07-2018 2/2 ground that the victim girl was got examined by the learned Magistrate under Section 164 Cr.P.C. made allegations against the petitioner and other co-accused, Kapil Yadav in this case. In view of the facts and circumstances discussed above and all materials available on the record, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below and makes prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by order of this Court. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T