Teras Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68825 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2017 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Teras Rai, Son of Late Ras Narayan Rai, Resident of Village - Chanda, P.S.- Marhowrah, Distt - Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Marhaurah P.S. Case No. 345 of 2017 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 487 of 2018, registered under Sections 341, 324, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge-X, Saran at Chapra. The accusation is that informant, Mahapatiya Devi, sold her silver Hauli at the jewelry shop of Satnarayan Sonar and took cash of Rs.20,000/-, because her husband, Rasnarayan Rai was suffering tuberculosis. When the informant reached at her house with cash of Rs.20,000/- then his one son, Teras Rai (petitioner) with his wife and Debanti Devi and son Amerika

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68825 of 2019(3) dt.18-02-2020 2/2 Roy tried to snatched the money, on which, her husband rushed to save her. At that time, Teras Roy (petitioner) gave Garasi blow on the head of her husband. When Basanti Devi and her son rushed to save then they were also assaulted by Teras Roy (petitioner) and his wife and son. Thereafter, her husband was rushed at Government Hospital, Marora, from where, he was referred to the Patna but her husband died in course of treatment.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner, who is son of the deceased has falsely been implicated in the present case due to family dispute and he is in custody since 03.11.2017.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of bail stands rejected.

Bhardwaj/- (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) U T