Ranju Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18705 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -116 Year- 2017 Thana -GARAUL District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Ranju Devi, Wife of Manoj Mallik, resident of Village Abbabkarpur, P.S. Goraul, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anita Kumari Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-05-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Goraul P.S.Case no.116 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner, who happens to sister-inlaw (Gotani) of the deceased of setting her on fire along with the other accused persons.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific allegation has been attributed against her and she is lady and allegations are general against the accused persons. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18705 of 2018 (3) dt.18-05-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Goraul P.S.Case no.116 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U