Dr. Bheemsen Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21771 of 2019 ====================================================== Dr. Bheemsen Kumar, S/o Krishna Pandit, resident of Village- Oyana Lakhapur, P.S.- Nehalpur, Distt.- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Patna 2.

The Joint Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Deputy Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Under Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5.

The Superintendent, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna 6.

The Superintendent, Shri Krishna Medical College and Hospital, Muzaffarpur 7.

The Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Sheohar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad Yadav, S.C.-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 10-06-2020 This matter was mentioned for listing on urgent basis, which was allowed by Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Accordingly, the same has been listed today for consideration through video conferencing in view of the nationwide lockdown on account of COVID-19 pandemic. The learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual Court proceedings from their homes, all with the aid of audio visual technology. Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.21771 of 2019(3) dt.10-06-2020 2/2 petitioner submits that one order dated 08.05.2020, vide Letter No.457, has been issued by the Under Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. He seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition to take appropriate steps for joining pursuant to the said order.

The order dated 08.05.2020, referred to by the petitioner's Counsel, is not on record in the instant proceedings. This Court would therefore refrain from expressing any opinion on the merits of the submission advanced by the petitioner's Counsel.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) PNM U