Mehnaj Mian @ Raja @ Manhaj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.8665 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2014 Thana -KAKO District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Mehnaj Mian @ Raja @ Manhaj, Son of Md. Kalim @ Md. Kalam, Resident of Village- Danobigha, Police Station- Makhdumpur in the district of Jehanabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navin Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2018 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kako P.S. Case No. 147 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The victim girl and petitioner are present in Chamber along with their respective counsels.
The victim girl and petitioner have stated that they have performed marriage and they both are living as husband and wife. From their wedlock, they have two children. Both children are also present in Chamber. In support of marriage they have filed Annexure-2 which is an affidavit filed by both sides. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8665 of 2018 (5) dt.23-04-2018 2/2 connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 147 of 2014, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.K. Rajak, learned Sub JudgeIV-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T