Sudama Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73314 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2022 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad ====================================================== SUDAMA SINGH Son of Late Narayan Chandwanshi Resident of village - Karma Bhagwan, P.S.- Muffasil, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bindeshwar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 323, 341 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner had taken an amount of Rs. 1,80,000/- fraudulently from the account of informant's wife by using false thumb impression to which petitioner was ready to return to the informant and later on he refused to pay back his money and also threatened him and insulted him with filthy languages.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Informant is mukhiya

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73314 of 2022(4) dt.08-05-2023 2/2 and his wife has purchased agreement bond of Rs. 1,80,000/- and after maturity, she has withdrawn her amount with interest and only with a view to harass the petitioner, this case has been lodged. It is further submitted on behalf of the petitioner that this matter relates to civil dispute. He is languishing in judicial custody since 19.08.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad Muffasil P.S. Case No. 242 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U