Yogendra Yadav @ Yogendra Singh @ Yogendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75170 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2022 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

YOGENDRA YADAV @ YOGENDRA SINGH @ YOGENDRA KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Haricharan Yadav Resident of village - Munshi Bigha, P.S.- Aurangabad (Muffasil), Dist.- Aurangabad (Bihar). 2.

Sunita Devi Wife of Yogendra Yadav @ Yogendra Singh @ Yogendra Kumar Singh Resident of village - Munshi Bigha, P.S.- Aurangabad (Muffasil), Dist.- Aurangabad (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Aurangabad (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.297 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that the informant and petitioner no.1 are own brothers. Their father who was in service got Rs.8,61,000/- at the time of his retirement. It is alleged that in the year 2018, the marriage of daughter of petitioners was fixed and petitioner no.1 requested his father to pay the total retirement amount to him with a promise that he will return the share of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75170 of 2022(2) dt.06-04-2023 2/2 complainant, but he did not return the money. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that there is petty dispute between the parties with regard to money.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad (Bihar) in connection with Aurangabad (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.297 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) S.KUMAR/- U T