Azad Ansari @ Azad Hussain v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72565 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2024 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Azad Ansari @ Azad Hussain S/O Jamaluddin @ Jamalu Dina Resident of village- Sareya, P.S.- Baniyapur, Dist.- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 943 of 2024, Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 133 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 366A, 380, 454 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the informant alleges that while she was away early morning, the accused came in a Bolero vehicle, kidnapped her 15-year-old daughter Anjali Kumari, and fled away despite her screams. It is further alleged that during the incident, two boxes containing cash, clothes, and ornaments were stolen.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72565 of 2025(3) dt.13-01-2026 2/3 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that victim in her Statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS has specifically stated that she left her house on her own sweet will and this petitioner never gave any compulsion or threat to her. He further submitted that nothing has been whispered against the petitioner in Section 183 BNSS statement of the victim. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 11.06.2024 and has one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no material against the petitioner in Section 183 BNSS statement of the victim as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sessions Trial No. 943 of 2024, Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 133 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72565 of 2025(3) dt.13-01-2026 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T