← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/1539/2018allowed

Jitendra Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-28Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1539 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2017 Thana -SURYAPURA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Jitendra Singh

2. Santosh Singh

3. Bijendra Singh &

4. Harendra Singh .... .... Appellants

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent.

Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the State. This Memo of Appeal has been directed against the order dated 12-03-2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-Ist, Rohtas in ABP No. 276 of 2018 by which, prayer for bail of the appellants has been refused in Surajpura P.S. Case No. 19 of 2017. The allegation of commission of assault, abuse and theft is general and omnibus. The background of allegation is that the appellant No. 1 has lodged Surajpura P.S. Case No. 20 of 2017 against the informant of this case and others. Considering the background of allegation, the prayer for anticipatory bail, is

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1539 of 2018 (3) dt.28-05-2018 allowed. Let the appellants named above in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rohtas, Sasaram in connection with Surajpura P.S. Case No. 19 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the appellants shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellants.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) A.K.V./- U T