Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28143/2018dismissed

Pawan Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-07-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28143 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1142 Year- 2016 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Pawan Kumar, Son of Lakshman Prasad Mahto, Resident of MohallaRamjichak, Bata, P.S.- Digha, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Khushboo Devi, Wife of Pawan Kumar, Resident of MohallaRamjichak, Bata, P.S.- Digha, District- Patna. at present residing at Ranipur Nimtal, P.S.- Mehandiganj, Patna City, District- Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1142©/16 registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 420, 504, 314/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he ousted the informant/wife from the house just after one month of the marriage and he has married with another lady also. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the girl has left the house on her own and the petitioner is ready to keep her but she is not ready to live with her as such she has filed

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28143 of 2018 (3) dt.16-07-2018 2/2 a divorce case.

Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail ono the ground the petitioner has criminal antecedent and he is accused in five other cases but in the bail petition only three cases have been mentioned and as such he is suppressing the material facts.. Having heard both sides and in view of suppression of the criminal antecedent about two other cases, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather let the petitioner surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U