Pankaj Rai @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69047 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2019 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

PANKAJ RAI @ PANKAJ KUMAR Son of Brajesh Rai @ Baleshwar Rai Resident of Village - Mansurpur Halaiya, P.S.- Kathara, Distt.- Vaishali. 2.

Vivek Kumar Son of Kamlesh Rai Resident of Village - Mansurpur Halaiya, P.S.- Kathara, Distt.- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-11-2019 Petitioners seek bail in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 258 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Allegation is of recovery of 112 litres of liquor from the Bolero vehicle and petitioners succeeded in fleeing away and their names were disclosed by the villagers. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that FIR does not show the name of villager who has disclosed their names and they are in custody since 31.8.2019 and charge sheet has been submitted and they have no criminal antecedent. Heard learned APP also.

In view of above facts and circumstances, let

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69047 of 2019(2) dt.26-11-2019 2/2 petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 258 of 2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further petitioners have to co-operate in disposal of trial.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T