Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75925/2024bail rejected

Parmod Kumar Mandal @ Parmod Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-29Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75925 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2024 Thana- PALASI District- Araria ====================================================== Parmod Kumar Mandal @ Parmod Mandal Son Of Mahesh Lal Mandal Resident Of Village- Kashibari, Ward No 10, Ps -PALASI, District -ARARIA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 29-01-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No.195 of 2024 under Sections 420, 328, 379/34 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 411 of the I.P.C. was also added.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against unknown persons against whom the informant has alleged that one accused has stolen his motorcycle and cash of Rs.2000/- by making him unconcious.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75925 of 2024(3) dt.29-01-2025 2/2 case. He further submits that petitioner's name has figured in this case by virtue of confessional statement of co-accused persons.

5. Learned Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner was involved in the said occurrence.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, if he surrenders within 4 weeks from today and prays for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order without being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T