← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71541/2025bail rejected

Ibrahim Safi @ Md. Ebrahim Safi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-13Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71541 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2025 Thana- PRATAPGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Ibrahim Safi @ Md. Ebrahim Safi S/O Liyakat Safi Resident of village - Bhawanipur, South, Ward No. 14, Police Station - Pratapganj, District - Supaul 2.

MD Kabir S/O Ibrahim Safi @ Md. Ebrahim Safi Resident of village - Bhawanipur, South, Ward No. 14, Police Station - Pratapganj, District - Supaul 3.

Shabnam Khatun @ Sabnam Khatun W/O Ibrahim Safi @ Md. Ebrahim Safi Resident of village - Bhawanipur, South, Ward No. 14, Police Station - Pratapganj, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 109, 132, 303(2), 75, 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per F.I.R., these petitioners assaulted informant, who is head master, by means of lathi, danda, iron rod as a result of which he sustained injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71541 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Allegation against petitioners is general and omnibus and there is no specific accusation of overt act against these petitioners.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that there is direct and specific accusation that these petitioners along with other accused persons assaulted informant as a result of which he sustained injury.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T