Ramesh Pandit v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71623 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2024 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Ramesh Pandit S/O Late Ambika Pandit R/O Vill.- Pokhara, P.s- Kotwa, District - East Champaran 2.
Mokhtar Pandit S/O Late Ambika Pandit R/O Vill.- Pokhara, P.s- Kotwa, District - East Champaran 3.
Dinesh Pandit S/O Mokhtar Pandit R/O Vill.- Pokhara, P.s- Kotwa, District - East Champaran 4.
SHASHI PANDIT S/O Kamlesh Pandit R/O Vill.- Pokhara, P.s- Kotwa, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1) and 303(1) of the B.N.S.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, Shashi assaulted the informant by farsa causing injury on head, thereafter petitioner no. 1 assaulted Rajkumar by Dabiya
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71623 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 causing injury on head and Ravi snatched Rs.20,000/- from the pocket of his brother.
4. Learned counsel submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is also submitted that an altercation had taken place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is next submitted that from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest the injury suffered by the injured has been discussed and from perusal of the same, it would manifest that the injury is not grievous nor the order impugned records the nature of injury. It is also submitted that petitioners are not criminals.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioner above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71623 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kotwa P.S. Case No.354 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T