Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.39242 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2018 Thana -KARPI District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Rohit Kumar S/o Ramakant Singh, R/o Vill.- Karwanbalram, P.O./P.S. Karpi, District- Arwal.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Karpi P.S. Case No. 56/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that he assaulted the informant with lathi and rod causing injury on his head. Case diary has been received.
Injury report of the informant is available at para 22 of the case diary wherein the doctor has found incised wound on the left side of skull 3"-1/4" and lacerated wound on the right knee 2"-1/2". The opinion with regard to injury no. 1, which is on the skull, is kept reserved and injury no. 2 is opined to be simple in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39242 of 2018 (3) dt.02-08-2018 2/2 nature.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 56/2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Arwal, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T