Parma Devi @ Premi Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75190 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2012 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Parma Devi @ Premi Devi, W/O Bino Thakur, Resident of Village- Baghras, P.S- Bakhri, Distt.- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025

1. Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 296 of 2012 dated 01.12.2012 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel are that the allegations levelled in the FIR are completely false, if the allegations are believed to be true even then petitioner's son has been alleged to have committed the alleged occurrence of kidnapping but in fact no such occurrence took place, the informant's daughter herself left her parents' house and solemnized marriage with the son of this petitioner and after the registration of the FIR, petitioner's son died and thereafter the victim solemnized marriage with some other

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75190 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 person. It is further submitted that the trial of the other two coaccused i.e. Bino Thakur and Ranjit Thakur has been concluded and they have been acquitted by the trial court. It is lastly submitted that the victim did not make any allegation against this petitioner in her statement recorded before the Judicial Magistrate a copy of which has been filed with this petition.

4. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner.

5. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the above stated facts, this court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above, in the event of her arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 296 of 2012 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

(Shailendra Singh, J) Rajiv/- U T