← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45018/2018dismissed

Chandan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-30Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45018 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -73 Year- 2018 Thana -CHANAN District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Chandan Paswan, son of Dadu Paswan @ Dahu Paswan, resident of villageBhandar, Police Station- Channan, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Raju, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 4/ 30-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Channan P.S. Case No.73 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 307 & 504/34 Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Lakhisarai. It is alleged in the written report that petitioner assaulted husband of the informant with iron rod on the head on account of which he sustained head injury.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the written report there is signature of wife of injured Baleshwar Paswan, whereas, written report is on behalf of the injured Baleshwar Paswan.

Restatement of the informant has been recorded in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45018 of 2018 (4) dt.30-08-2018 2/2 the case diary, which is available in para 22 of the case diary, wherein, she has supported the case and levelled specific allegation against the petitioner for causing head injury. Injury report of the injured is also available in the case diary, wherein, doctor has found lacerated wound on left parietal bone caused by hard and blunt substance grievous in nature.

In such circumstances, this Court does not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.

Prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected.

Petitioner may surrender before the Court below and seek regular bail, which shall be considered and disposed off in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- Rohit Kr.

U T