Dinesh Kumar @ Ritesh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71990 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2025 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
Dinesh Kumar @ Ritesh S/o Upendra Rai @ Upendra Yadav Resident of Village- Dharam Bana, P.S.- Dumra, Dist- Sitamarhi 2.
Aloki Kumar @ Alok Kumar S/o Yogendra Yadav @ Yogendra Rai Resident of Village- Dharam Bana, P.S.- Dumra, Dist- Sitamarhi 3.
Ravi Kumar S/o Upendra Rai @ Upendra Yadav Resident of VillageDharam Bana, P.S.- Dumra, Dist- Sitamarhi 4.
Upendra Yadav @ Upendra Rai S/o Kapil Rai Resident of Village- Dharam Bana, P.S.- Dumra, Dist- Sitamarhi 5.
Ashish Kumar S/o Yogendra Yadav @ Yogendra Rai Resident of VillageDharam Bana, P.S.- Dumra, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar, APP Mr.Mahendra Thakur, Adv.for Informant ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for offence under Sections 103(1), 103(2) and 61 of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The informant alleges that co-accused Rajesh Yadav along with four accused came to his house and asked him to accompany them along with his son and both the laptops, accordingly the informant along with his son and both the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71990 of 2025(2) dt.12-11-2025 2/3 laptops accompanied them and reached their house, where several accused persons including petitioners were already present. The informant further alleges that the accused persons took his son to other side, where seven unknown accused were present from before and the accused snatched the laptop and tied his son in a room and put clothes in his mouth, thereafter took out all his nails from the legs and co-accused Rajesh Yadav stabbed him while co-accused Vijay Yadav gave electric shock and the accused left his son in an injured condition and asked the informant to take his son away or else he would be killed. Subsequently, son of informant succumbed to his injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per F.I.R. itself, specific accusation of inflicting knife in the abdomen of son of informant is against co-accused Rajesh Yadav and thereafter, giving electric shock to him (informant's son) is against co-accused Vijay Yadav. So far as these petitioners are concerned, there is no specific allegation of assault. Similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 17.10.2025 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 56517 of 2025. Petitioners are in custody since 12.06.2025. Chargesheet has been submitted.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71990 of 2025(2) dt.12-11-2025 3/3
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of custody, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 171 of 2025.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T