Kanti Kuer @ Kanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76237 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2024 Thana- SAHAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Kanti Kuer @ Kanti Devi, Wife of Late Madan Rai, Resident of VillagePerhap, PS- Sahar, Distt.- Bhojpur, Arrah ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 166 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 61(2), 103(1), 109, 190, 191(2) and 191(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is in two parts. In the first, part seven accused persons are named and allegation against them is that they have made indiscriminate firing on the husband of the informant. In the second part, the petitioner along with other have named and allegation against them is that they have hatched the plan to get the husband of the informant killed.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76237 of 2024(3) dt.22-01-2025 2/2 offence. Pettitioner is a lady and she has falsely been implicated in this case. From perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is clear that that there is no specific allegation of any overt act against this petitioner. It is further submitted that during course of investigation, even one of the co-accused namely, Pursottam Kumar has given his confessional statement and in that statement also there is no discription of the role of this petitioner. She is languishing in judicial custody since 10.09.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.Ist/Successor Court, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 166 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T