Munny @ Nuzhat Bano And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33546 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -119 Year- 2017 Thana -RAUTA District- PURNIA ======================================================
1. Munny @ Nuzhat Bano, W/o Farooke @ Farooke Alam, R/o Vill.- Minapur, P.S.- Baria Baloan, District- Katihar.
2. Nadim @ Ashraf Nadeem,
3. Adil @ Ashraf Adil Both Sons of Late Abdul Rajjak, All Residents of Vill.- Nimol, P.S.- Azam Nagar, District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the informant as well as the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Routa P.S. Case No. 119/2017, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that on the basis of advertisement published in Hindi Newspaper, the informant contacted on mobile number described in Newspaper and as per terms informant paid Rs. 6,71,650/- in four accounts given by accused persons and got receipts on assurance but as per assurance, accused persons did not give loan amount. Later on, the informant learnt that these petitioners along with other co-accused
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33546 of 2018 (4) dt.14-08-2018 2/2 as named in the written report are family members and are running a forged finance company and cheating the persons including the informant.
Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has already been issued against the petitioners.
The report of the court below has been received wherein it has been mentioned that process under Section 82 Cr.P.C.has already been issued against these petitioners on 19.05.2018.
In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. The petitioners are directed to surrender before the Court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.
(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T