Pankaj Shah @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73585 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2021 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

PANKAJ SHAH @ PANKAJ KUMAR S/o Harishankar Shah R/vFathehabad, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur 2.

CHHOTU SHAH @ RAJLAXMI @ ARUN KUMAR S/o Harishankar Shah R/v- Fathehabad, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

The accused both petitioners are named in F.I.R. and apprehending their arrest in connection with Paroo P. S. Case No. 12 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 427, 497, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against both above named petitioners is to damage the vehicle of informant and also to taken away cash

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73585 of 2022(2) dt.03-05-2023 2/3 of Rs. 73,000/- belongs to informant.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that both parties are agnet and there is also a counter case suggesting inimical terms between them. It is submitted that only to make allegations aggravate, allegation of theft was imported without having any occasion. It is further submitted that lodging of FIR was delayed by 8 days without having any just explanation, where allegation as regard to theft and to damage vehicle is appearing very much general and omnibus. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioners are men of clean antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer of anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and by taking note of nature of allegation against both petitioners which is appearing very much general and omnibus, let both above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before learned Court below within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IIIrd, Muzaffarpur (West)/concerned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73585 of 2022(2) dt.03-05-2023 3/3 Court, in connection with Paroo P. S. Case No. 12 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) R.S.Sen/- U T