Vikram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72923 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2022 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vikram Kumar S/o- Om Prakash Prasad R/v- Bank Road W.No-6, Raxaul PsRaxaul Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard the parties.
2. At the outset, learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to make correction in para-3 of the bail application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Let the same be done during the course of the day.
5. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 26 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
6. Allegedly, the petitioner along with seven named accused persons as well as 15-20 unknown persons variously armed came at the place of occurrence and assaulted the informant and others. There is specific allegation that this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72923 of 2025(3) dt.03-12-2025 2/3 petitioner was having country made pistol in his hand and he snatched Rs.65,000/- along with co-accused persons.
7. Learned Advocate for the petitioner referring to the FIR contended that so far the allegation of snatching of money along with another co-accused person, the same is concocted and as such completely denied; moreover the narratives made in the FIR clearly suggest that the petitioner is not the person, who specifically assaulted any of the injured leading to any injury. The reason behind false implication is said to be previous enmity on account of business rivalry. The petitioner undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.
8. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that besides two criminal antecedent, the petitioner has actively participated in the crime.
9. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note of the accusation levelled against the petitioner, besides there is no specific allegation levelled against the petitioner of causing assault to any of the person, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72923 of 2025(3) dt.03-12-2025 3/3 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 26 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U T