Nausad Ansari @ Md. Nausad Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69963 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2019 Thana- KATORIYA District- Banka ====================================================== NAUSAD ANSARI @ MD. NAUSAD ANSARI Son of Suleman Miya @ Suleman Ansari Resident of Village- Sirsana, P.S.- Katoria, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Nandad Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 20.08.2019 in connection with Katoria P.S. Case No. 116/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that alleged recoveries were from the possession of one Shamsheruddin and not the present petitioner. It is further submitted that the said Shamsheruddin has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 26.08.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 53365 of 2019.

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances and the petitioner is having one other antecedent, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, on furnishing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69963 of 2019(2) dt.18-11-2019 2/2 bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Banka, in connection with Katoria P.S. Case No. 116/2019, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T