← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18488/2022disposed

Ugranath Jha v. Biscomman

2023-12-11Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18488 of 2022 ====================================================== Ugranath Jha, Son of Late Shrikant Jha, Resident of Mohalla- Bangali Tola, P.S.- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Biscomman through the Managing Director, Patna. 2.

The Secretary, Biscomaun, Patna.

3.

Managing Director, Biscomaun, Patna.

4.

Special Officer (Establishment), Biscomaun, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashish Giri, Advocate Ms. Riya Giri, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-12-2023 Heard Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Biscomaun.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is only confined to payment of subsistence allowance for the period, May, 2014 to November, 2015, which has not been paid as yet, despite he being superannuated on 30.11.2019 from the office of Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Limited (Biscomaun).

3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that for ventilating his grievance, the petitioner has already filed several representations, but the same have not been considered and disposed of.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents raised the

Patna High Court CWJC No.18488 of 2022(2) dt.11-12-2023 2/2 preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of the present writ petition.

5. Considering the limited prayer of the petitioner, the present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Managing Director, Biscomaun, Patna, who shall consider the claim of the petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. Needless to observe that in case the claim of the petitioner is found admissible, necessary consequential order shall also be passed.

(Harish Kumar, J) uday/- U