← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68368/2019dismissed

Prakash Chandra Prabhakar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68368 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2014 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== PRAKASH CHANDRA PRABHAKAR Son of Sri Brahma Deo Das (The Then Junior Engineer, Public Health Division, Arwal), Resident of MohallaNewalal Chowk, Bhattha Bazar, Purnea, P.S- K.Hat, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhola Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-11-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Spl. Case No. 75 (A) of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 409/34, of the Indian Penal Code, later on Section 13 (2) read with Section 13

(1) (D) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Earlier anticipatory bail of petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 26.07.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 66596 of 2018.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has already deposited the amount in question and he has sought relief given to the other accused persons. Heard learned counsel for the Vigilance Department

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68368 of 2019(2) dt.06-11-2019 2/2 also.

In view of the fact that earlier anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below and make prayer for regular bail and learned court below while passing the order shall consider the fact that petitioner has already deposited the amount in question.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) T.Kr./- U T