Rajo Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73653 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-910 Year-2018 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

RAJO CHAUHAN Son of Late Dahu Chauhan Resident of VillageDurgapur, P.S.- Dhamaul, District- Nawada 2.

DEEPA DEVI Wife of Rajo Chauhan Resident of Village- Durgapur, P.S.- Dhamaul, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sangeeta Devi Wife of Vinay Chauhan Resident of Village- Beldariya, P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jagdhar Prasad, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, in-laws of the complainant tortured upon her physically and mentally. They also ousted her from her matrimonial home.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73653 of 2022(2) dt.03-02-2023 2/2 been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the complainant has performed second marriage with one Dindayal Chandan and for saving her own skin, she lodged the present false case. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No.910(c) of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T