Sanjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79181 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-922 Year-2023 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Sanjit Yadav Son of Lakhan Yadav Resident of Village - Bardag, Police Station - Mohanpur, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .. ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheikh Arkan Ahmad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case no. 922 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 427, 354, 307, 379, 506 of Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that when the informant was at his house, the petitioner alongwith others reached there. There is specific allegation against this petitioner that he assaulted with an axe on the head of the informant due to which informant received cut injury.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79181 of 2024(2) dt.02-12-2024 2/2 case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is delay of two months in lodging the case . There is land dispute between the parties. From perusal of the injury report also it is clear that injuries which were received by the informant were caused by hard and blunt object. The allegation and the injury does not co-relate. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case no. 922 of 2023, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M 2nd , Sherghati, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Suruchi/- U T