Ashok Shahi @ Ashok Sahi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.70591 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2017 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ashok Shahi @ Ashok Sahi, Son of Chhabila Shahi, Resident of VillageBalathari, P.S. Kuchaikote, District-Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Prashant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Kuchaikote P.S. Case No.284/2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner has earlier moved this Court for bail in Cr. Misc. No.16045/ 2018 which was rejected vide order dated 16.04.2018 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in custody.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the observation made in order dated 16.04.2018, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.70591 of 2018(3) dt.12-12-2018 2/2 and Sessions Judge- V, Gopalganj in connection with Sessions Trial No.21/2018 arising out of Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 284/2017. with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T