← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16103/2023disposed

Motilal Soren v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-08Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16103 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Motilal Soren Son of Anuplal Soren, Resident of Jakar, Ward no. 07, Palsa, Katihar, P.O.-Tangore, P.S.-Azamnagar, Bihar-854116. 2.

Md. Tanweer Ahmad Son of Ali Tabarak Ansari Resident of Manohar Para, Tengar, Katihar, P.O.-Tangore, P.S.-Azamnagar Bihar-854116 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Bihar Government, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Bihar Government, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Katihar 4.

The Circle Officer, Azamnagar, Katihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kameshwar Pd. Gupta, GP-10 Mr. Satya Vrat, AC to GP-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-01-2024 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Satya Vrat, learned AC to learned GP-10 for the respondent/s.

2. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that for the relief(s), which the petitioners have prayed for in the present writ petition, they have already filed a detailed representation before the District Magistrate, Katihar and seeks to pursue remedy before him.

3. Considering the aforesaid submission made on

Patna High Court CWJC No.16103 of 2023(2) dt.08-01-2024 2/2 behalf of the petitioners, the District Magistrate, Katihar, is directed to take steps to call for the records relating to the concerned headquarter village, as well as, the proposed construction of Panchayat Headquarter on the government land or any land contributed by the petitioners or any person willing to register the same in the name of the State Government. Thereafter, considering the development work, the District Magistrate, Katihar, must ensure to take appropriate decision within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U