Rakesh Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73163 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2024 Thana- PALI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Rakesh Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar Son of Lalu Yadav @ Rajendra Kumar Yadav Resident of village - Lalban Bigha, P.S.- Pali, District - Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Mungeshwar Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 28.11.2024 at about 4 PM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, abused the informant and thereafter, co-accused Uttam Kumar and Sonu Kumar assaulted him with iron rod and snatched cash of Rs. 10,000/-.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that specific accusation of assault is against co-accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73163 of 2025(2) dt.18-11-2025 2/2 Uttam Kumar and Sonu Kumar. Petitioner is only alleged to have abused the informant and there is no allegation of assault or any overt act against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Pali P.S. Case No. 101 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T