Sadiq Ali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73505 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-359 Year-2022 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Sadiq Ali Son Of Late Amjad Ali R/O Mohalla- Imli Adam Khan, Ward No.16, Sasaram, P.O. And P.S.- Sasaram Town, District- Rohtas 2.

Ishrat @ Ishrat Ali @ Ishrat Jahan Wife Of Sadiq Ali R/O Mohalla- Imli Adam Khan, Ward No.16, Sasaram, P.O. And P.S.- Sasaram Town, DistrictRohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 09-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have prayed for grant of bail in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 359 of 2022 registered under sections 498A, 304(B), 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegations against the petitioners is that they killed the sister of the informant due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law due to which they have been falsely been implicated in this present case. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73505 of 2022(2) dt.09-02-2023 2/2 further submitted that petitioners have no concern with mess and business of the deceased. Informant's sister always put pressure on her husband for separation with his family. There is no prior complaint in respect of torture and demand of dowry rather general and omnibus allegations have been levelled against them. The husband of the deceased is in judicial custody. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. They are languishing in judicial custody since 01.08.2022. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 359 of 2022 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T