Yasin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77699 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2024 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Yasin Ansari S/o M. Akbar @ Md. Akbar Ansari Resident of villageDandarpur, P.S.- Janta Bazar, Distt.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Afsana Khatoon D/o Salauddin Ansari, W/o Yasin Ansari Presently Residing at vill - Banpura, P.S. - Janta Bazar, Distt.- Saran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Harish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. No one appears on behalf of opposite party no.2 despite issuance of notice.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Janta Bazar Case no.95 of 2024 registered under sections 498A, 323, 307, 341 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

3. The allegation in the F.I.R is with regard to demand of dowry and torture and petitioner is the husband.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that submits that the allegation of demand of dowry and torture is false and concocted. The petitioner is always ready to keep his wife with full dignity and honour but it is the informant/opposite party no.2 who never wants to live with the petitioner. Further, it has been submitted that a jointness affidavit has been filed in the present case and perusal of same it would appear that statement

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77699 of 2024(7) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 has been made with regard to compromise between the parties and also that a compromise petition has been filed by them before the learned Magistrate in which they have mutually decided to live separately, however, the said compromise petition has not been brought on record. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to co-operate in case/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Janta Bazar Case no.95 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023 and subject to the further condition that existence of compromise between the paries may be verified. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T