Suresh Choudhary @ Suresh Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74004 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-262 Year-2025 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Suresh Choudhary @ Suresh Kumar Chaudhary S/o Jaleshwar Choudhary Resident of Village - Mahdipur, P.S. - Doriganj, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-10-2025 Heard Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Renu Kumari, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 262 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 08 liters liquor was recovered from motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74004 of 2025(2) dt.30-10-2025 2/2 for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by local people. It is further submitted that the petitioner has got no concern with the motorcycle in question. The petitioner is in custody since 31.08.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 262 of 2025.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T